USPTO serial 75407317
OPTIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2552944Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 26, 2002
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
San Mateo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUZAN ONEL
SUZAN ONEL MCKENNA & CUNEO LLP1900 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | polarizing film to be coated onto goods for optical filtering; transparent plastic or glass with polarized light filtering properties for use in flat panel computer displays, computer monitors, eyeglasses and sunglasses, video monitors and television sets; optical filters; polarizing liquid crystal suspension having polarizing light filtering properties when applied to transparent glass or plastic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 4, 1999 |
| 021 | glass, which has a film applied to it in liquid crystal suspension form with polarizing light filtering properties, for use in home or automobile windows | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |