USPTO serial 75407409
PLANET X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLANET X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARRY MILLER
LARRY MILLER FEDER KASZOVITZ ISSACSON ETAL750 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Plush toys, animated plush toys, mechanical plush toys, action figures and accessories therefor, playset buildings and accessories therefor; toy jewelry, dolls and accessories therefor, miniaturized dolls and accessories therefor, collectible toy figures, mechanical action figures and accessories therefor, toy jewelry boxes, cases for play accessories, pocket playsets for action figures, toy tea sets, toy animal figures, fashion dolls, clothing for fashion dolls and fashion doll accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |