USPTO serial 75407696
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Maryland Heights, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
Maryland Heights, MO
ST. LOUIS, MO
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH SOLOMON
LOUIS LADERMAN UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION2150 SCHUETZ RDST LOUIS, MO 63146UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | PLANT FOOD AND HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SOIL AMENDMENTS, POTTING MIXES, FERTILIZERS, LEAF POLISHES, AND PLANT GROWTH HORMONES AND STIMULANTS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |