Drawing for CARE FOR PLANTS

USPTO serial 75407696

CARE FOR PLANTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARE FOR PLANTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KENNETH SOLOMON

LOUIS LADERMAN UNITED INDUSTRIES CORPORATION2150 SCHUETZ RDST LOUIS, MO 63146UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001PLANT FOOD AND HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SOIL AMENDMENTS, POTTING MIXES, FERTILIZERS, LEAF POLISHES, AND PLANT GROWTH HORMONES AND STIMULANTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 18, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 18, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 8, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 24, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance