USPTO serial 75408024
RIOPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RIOPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Industries Riopel Inc./ Riopel Industries Inc.
Province de Quebec, GOS 3JO, CA
Other trademarks owned by Industries Riopel Inc./ Riopel Industries Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M COLLEN
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOC PCMCGLEW AND TUTTLESCARBOROUGH STATION BOX 306SCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-8006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR SLAUGHTERING ANIMALS, CUTTING, PREPARING AND PACKAGING MEAT | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY USED FOR SLAUGHTERING, CUTTING, PREPARING AND PACKAGING MEAT | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | CUSTOM MANUFACTURE OF EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY USED FOR SLAUGHTERING, CUTTING, PREPARING AND PACKAGING MEAT | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Industries Riopel Inc./ Riopel Industries Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named RIOPEL
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |