USPTO serial 75408228
DG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M LEE JR
WILLIAM M LEE JR LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMS SWEENEY ET ALP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, PERFUMES, ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR LOTION, NON-MEDICATED HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS AND HAIR COLORING PREPARATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER AND PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKLETS, CHARTS AND GUIDES ALL RELATING TO HAIR AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, BEAUTY TREATMENT, HAIRDRESSING, HAIR CUTTING, HAIR STYLING, HAIR COLORING AND HAIR LIGHTENING | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES AND SEMINARS RELATED TO HAIR CUTTING, HAIR STYLING, HAIR COLORING AND HAIR LIGHTENING | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HAIRDRESSING SALON SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hair Colour Consultants Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DANIEL GALVIN LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DG
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |