USPTO serial 75408518
MAYFAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAYFAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
13403 Berlin, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPSTE 2000TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ 180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CANDY; CHEWING GUM; CHOCOLATE; CHOCOLATE CANDIES; PRALINES; AND PASTRIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |