Drawing for GETSMART MORTGAGE FINDER

USPTO serial 75408540

GETSMART MORTGAGE FINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GETSMART MORTGAGE FINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROLINE E PAPAS

SUSAN K FLINT LEGAL DEPARTMENTPROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION201 MSN ST 12TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Dissemination of advertisements for others through the use of a global computer information networkACTIVE—
036Financial analysis and consultation services, namely, providing information regarding loans, credit cards, and financial investments available from third parties and providing referrals to said providers; and providing credit card and loan application evaluation and filing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 18, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 17, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance