Drawing for WOWFACTOR WOMEN ON THE WEB

USPTO serial 75409548

WOWFACTOR WOMEN ON THE WEB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOWFACTOR WOMEN ON THE WEB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLYE B. DAVIDSON

LESLYE B DAVIDSON DAVIDSON DAVIDSON & KAPPEL LLC1140 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting and facilitating the sale of goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic marketplace accessed through a global computer network; online ordering services featuring services provided by others in the fields of marketing, advertising, global computer network access, website development, website design and website hostingACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing an on-line directory of contact information of businesses, individuals and nonprofit organizations which provide goods and services in the field of electronic commerce, current world news and events, business, finance, technology, career, lifestyle, parenting, family, health, wellness, culture, travel, fashion and topics of interest to womenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 22, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 7, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance