USPTO serial 75410099
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE SHAVE WALD
JANE SHAVE WALD OPPENHIEMER POMS SMITH2029 CENTURY PARK E 38TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3024UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Xylitol, artificial sweeteners, lecithin, starch for industrial purposes, surface-active chemical agents, polyol, dimer acid, gluconic acid, lipase, chitin, chitosan, linseed oil and perilla oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical syringes; hypodermic needles; infusion sets; injector instruments for administering medication, suturing instruments, blood transfusion instruments, stethoscopes, sterilizing apparatus, operating tables, contraceptives, dermatologic orthopedic instruments and pincettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Epoxidized soybean oil, rapseed oil, soybean oil, sesame oil, corn oil, peanut oil, olive oil, cotton-seed oil, wheat germ oil, sunflower oil, laver, brown seaweed, tangle, and green laver | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |