USPTO serial 75410333
NX LEVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NX LEVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTOFER E HALVORSON
KRISTOFER E HALVORSON HALVORSON & VENABLE PC3030 N CENTRAL AVE STE 707PHOENIX, AZ 85012UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, athletic wear including, but not limited to, T-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, hats, athletic socks, sweat bands, polo-style shirts, shorts, sweats and warm-ups | ACTIVE | Mar 16, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1998 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |