Drawing for WEBVAN

USPTO serial 75410340

WEBVAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEBVAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID HYMAN

DAVID HYMAN GENERAL COUNSELWEBVAN GROUP, INC310 LAKESIDE DRFOSTER CITY, CA 94404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029meats, poultry and game; processed, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams, jellies and fruit sauces; edible processed seeds; pickles; and processed olivesACTIVEMay 1, 2000
030staple goods, namely, coffee, teas and processed cereals; bakery products; condiments, namely, mustard, mayonnaise, ketchup and relish; salad dressings; and spicesACTIVEMay 1, 2000
031natural and agricultural products, namely, fresh fruits, vegetables, flowers and herbsACTIVEMay 1, 2000
032beer, soft drinks, spring water, drinking water, mineral water, fruit flavored soft drinks and fruit juicesACTIVEMay 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2001ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Aug 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 27, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 1, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 24, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 25, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 23, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance