USPTO serial 75410340
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID HYMAN
DAVID HYMAN GENERAL COUNSELWEBVAN GROUP, INC310 LAKESIDE DRFOSTER CITY, CA 94404| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meats, poultry and game; processed, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jams, jellies and fruit sauces; edible processed seeds; pickles; and processed olives | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 030 | staple goods, namely, coffee, teas and processed cereals; bakery products; condiments, namely, mustard, mayonnaise, ketchup and relish; salad dressings; and spices | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 031 | natural and agricultural products, namely, fresh fruits, vegetables, flowers and herbs | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
| 032 | beer, soft drinks, spring water, drinking water, mineral water, fruit flavored soft drinks and fruit juices | ACTIVE | May 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2001 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |