USPTO serial 75410409
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SOUNDMATTERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reno, NV
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather A. Dunn
Heather A. Dunn DLA PIPER LLP (US)555 MISSION STREET, SUITE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | consultation services in the field of audio electronics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 20, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 6, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 1, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |