USPTO serial 75410442
VIZIT/IN3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIZIT/IN3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5V 3K2, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KERRY J MCLEAN
KERRY J MCLEAN HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK3 EMBARCADERO CTR 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the design and implementation of two and three dimensional interactive data visualizations which may be connected to databases and other information sources, and user and installation guides and manuals sold therewith, | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Consulting and and customizing services relating to computer software for the design and implementation of two and three dimensional interactive data visualizations which may be connected to databases and other information sources, | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |