USPTO serial 75410593
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
CALEDONIA, MI
Other trademarks owned by FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
CALEDONIA, MI
Foremost Corporation of America
Caledonia, MI
FOREMOST CORPORATION OF AMERICA
CALEDONIA, MI
Foremost Corporation of America
Caledonia, MI
Foremost Corporation of America
Caledonia, MI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Felicia J. Boyd
Felicia J. Boyd Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1100Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 7, 2021 | PPAC | PETITION PENDING - AMENDMENT COMMENT PERIOD | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 8, 2021 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - INFORMATION MADE OF RECORD | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 7, 2018 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |