Drawing for DIAGNOGENE

USPTO serial 75411707

DIAGNOGENE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIAGNOGENE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR RESEARCH USE IN THE PREPARATION, AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS; KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR RESEARCH USE IN THE PREPARATION, AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDSACTIVE—
005DIANGOSTIC REAGENTS FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL LABORATORY USE IN THE PREPARATION, AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS; KITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS FOR CLINICAL MEDICAL LABORATORY USE IN THE PREPARATION, AMPLIFICATION AND DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDSACTIVE—
009RESEARCH LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FOR USE WITH DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS AND DIAGNOSTIC KITS, NAMELY, SPECTROPHOTOMETER, SUPPORT RACKS, CENTRIFUGE, LABORATORY GLASSWARE AND DRY INCUBATORACTIVE—
010MEDICAL CLINCAL LABORATORY EQUIPMENT FOR USE WITH MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS AND MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC KITS, NAMELY, SPECTROPHOTOMETER, SUPPORT RACKS, CENTRIFUGE, LABORATORY GLASSWARE AND DRY INCUBATORACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance