USPTO serial 75412004
SMART ROBOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 16, 1999
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART ROBOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LLOYD L RICH
LLC L RICH LAW OFFICE OF LLC L RICH1163 VINE STDENVER, CO 80206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | MOBILE AND STATIONARY TOY ROBOTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 22, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMART ROBOTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PERSONAL ROBOT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PERSONAL ROBOT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SMART ROBOTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 12, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |