Drawing for MILLENNIUM INFORMATION

USPTO serial 75412116

MILLENNIUM INFORMATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM INFORMATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer information services, namely, providing databases in the field of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticals via global, national and local computer networks; computer database services, namely, creating and customizing databases for others in the fields of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticals; computer services, namely, custom software development services; computer services, namely, assistance with use of computer software; computer services in the nature of contract computational services for others; research, development, validation and testing services for others in the fields of genomics, life sciences and pharmaceuticals and consultation related theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 21, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 24, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 3, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance