Drawing for ISAVE

USPTO serial 75412151

ISAVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISAVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BETH M GOLDMAN

BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software used for online promotions, namely, merchandizing, couponing, incentive programs, marketing surveys, promotional sales, promotional interactive emailing, e-commerce, datamining, online ads, serving ads and promotions, tracking promotions and ads, sweepstakes, and give-awaysACTIVE—
016discount and promotional coupons; discount and promotional coupons on global computer information networksACTIVE—
035online retail store services in the field of general merchandise; creating and preparing online advertisements for others; incentive business marketing consulting services, namely, merchandizing, couponing, incentive programs, surveying, product sales, e-commerce, email, rich media online ads, serving ads and promotions, tracking promotions and ads, datamining, sweepstakes, and give-awaysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 16, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance