USPTO serial 75412523
SUPREMA FRESH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPREMA FRESH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX
Guadalajara, Jalisco, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J CHALFIE
EDWARD J CHALFIE CHALFIE & ASSOCIATES311 S WACKER DR STE 5125CHICAGO, IL 60606-6622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved and processed fruits and vegetables, namely, preserved grapefruits, mangoes, papayas, pineapples, strawberries, oranges, limes and tangerines, and tropical fruit cocktail and citrus fruit cocktail and fruit and vegetable-based sauces and pastes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |