Drawing for MADHUR JAFFREY

USPTO serial 75412539

MADHUR JAFFREY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADHUR JAFFREY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GLENN A GUNDERSEN

GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Meat and meat extracts, eggs, milk, dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yogurt, fish, poultry and game; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams and fruit preserves, edible oils and fats, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; potato crisps, potato chips, processed nuts, fruit-based chips, namely, cassava chips and lentil-based snack, namely, chana dahlACTIVE—
030salad dressing, processed cereals, coffee, artificial coffee, tea, sugar, tapioca, sago, flour, yeast, baking powder, honey, treacle, vinegar, sauces, spices, salt, mustard, alimentary pastes, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen confections; pastries, candy, pies, cakes, cookies, processed cereal-based snack foods and rice; grain and wheat-based snack foods, fried wafers, namely, poppadoms; roasted wafers, namely, podads; fried-flour based snack, namely, sev, crackers containing prawns, processed popcorn, pretzels, tortilla chips, and breads, including, nan, paratha, and chappitis breadsACTIVE—
031Unprocessed fruits and vegetables from the regions of India, Sri Lanka, Tibet, Bhutan and PakistanACTIVE—
032yogurt-based smoothies, namely, lasiACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 15, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 25, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 28, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 29, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance