USPTO serial 75412539
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GLENN A GUNDERSEN
GLENN A GUNDERSEN DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS4000 BELL ATLANTIC TWR1717 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2793| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat and meat extracts, eggs, milk, dairy products, excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yogurt, fish, poultry and game; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellies, jams and fruit preserves, edible oils and fats, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; potato crisps, potato chips, processed nuts, fruit-based chips, namely, cassava chips and lentil-based snack, namely, chana dahl | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | salad dressing, processed cereals, coffee, artificial coffee, tea, sugar, tapioca, sago, flour, yeast, baking powder, honey, treacle, vinegar, sauces, spices, salt, mustard, alimentary pastes, prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; frozen confections; pastries, candy, pies, cakes, cookies, processed cereal-based snack foods and rice; grain and wheat-based snack foods, fried wafers, namely, poppadoms; roasted wafers, namely, podads; fried-flour based snack, namely, sev, crackers containing prawns, processed popcorn, pretzels, tortilla chips, and breads, including, nan, paratha, and chappitis breads | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Unprocessed fruits and vegetables from the regions of India, Sri Lanka, Tibet, Bhutan and Pakistan | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | yogurt-based smoothies, namely, lasi | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |