USPTO serial 75412547
DOMCO INLAID FUSION FLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2451274Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 15, 2001
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DOMCO INLAID FUSION FLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Farnham, Province of Quebec, CA
FARNHAM, CA
Farnham, Province of Quebec, CA
FRANHAM, QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMON LEMAY
SIMON LEMAY LAVERY DE BILLY925, CHEMIN ST-LOUIS STE 500QUEBEC CITY, QC G1S 1C1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | FLOOR COVERINGS, NAMELY, INLAID VINYL FLOORING IN THE FORM OF SHEETS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 15, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DOMCO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TARKETT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOMCO INC.
- Other trademarks owned by DOMCO TARKETT INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named DOMCO INLAID FUSION FLOOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |