USPTO serial 75412568
GREAT ESSENTIALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2585602Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 25, 2002
- Examiner
- WISEMAN, MICHELLE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREAT ESSENTIALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pleasantville, NY
Pleasantville, NY
Pleasantville, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDRES J VALDESPINO
ANDRES J VALDESPINO VALDESPINO COPLAND, LLP55 S BROADWAYTARRYTOWN, NY 10591UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order services featuring retail and wholesale home improvement items, namely flood prevention devices, water leak detectors, and security alarms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |