Drawing for REAL FRESH FOOD! - REAL LOW PRICES!

USPTO serial 75412725

REAL FRESH FOOD! - REAL LOW PRICES!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL FRESH FOOD! - REAL LOW PRICES!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES A MITCHELL

JAMES A MITCHELL PRICE HENEVELD COOPER DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR, S EPOST OFFICE BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL SUPERMARKET AND GROCERY STORE SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 14, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 25, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 24, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 5, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 30, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance