USPTO serial 75412959
Serial No. 75412959
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75412959?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | eau de toilette, cologne, eau de cologne, eau de parfum, parfum, parfum de toilette, perfume, perfume oil, after shave, personal stick deodorant, personal spray deodorant, after shave balm, bath soap, hair and body shampoo, shave foam, body and bath gel, body lotion, talcum powder | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |