USPTO serial 75413138
NEGOTIATION-BASED SELLING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 14, 2000
- Examiner
- HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEGOTIATION-BASED SELLING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence J. Siskind
LAWRENCE J SISKIND HARVEY SISKIND JACOBS LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR 39TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS, PROGRAMS AND SEMINARS, IN THE FIELD OF CONSULTATIVE SALES, AND DISTRIBUTING COURSE MATERIALS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 3, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 8, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |