USPTO serial 75413597
BNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
78430 Louveciennes, FR
78430 Louveciennes, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD J KONDRACKI
EDWARD J KONDRACKI KERKAM STOWELL KONDRACKI & CLARKE PC2 SKYLINE PL STE 6005203 LEESBURG PIKEFALLS CHURCH, VA 22041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers, computer peripherals and computer software for information processing and telecommunications, namely, combinations of hardware and software used to encrypt data for identification of personnel and authenticating exchange of information via computer and telecommunications links and reporting intrusion attempts for data processing equipment and telecommunication networks; telecommunication equipment, namely, personal computers, servers and modems on computer hardware and peripherals for transmission of encrypted data; software for encryption of data; identification cards, namely, portable cards including microprocessors for authenticating exchange of information and reporting intrusion attempts for data processing, networks, and telecommunication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | engineering services for the design and development of software for encryption of data and authentication of exchange of information and data used for identification of personnel and transmission between computer networks and telecommunication systems and for reporting intrusion attempts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |