USPTO serial 75413744
TOUCHABLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2428677Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2001
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOUCHABLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Terra Haute, IN
Terre Haute, IN
Terre Haute, IN
St. Michael, BB
HELEN OF TROY LIMITED (BARBADOS)
BRIDGETOWN, BB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory S. Vickers
Gregory S. Vickers Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP23755 Lorain Road, Suite 200North Olmsted, OH 44070-2224UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; kitchen utensils, namely, non-electric peelers, graters, corers, pizza wheels, cheese planes, grapefruit trimmers, non-electric kitchen knives, scissors and zesters; rolling mincers; garden tools, namely, trowels, cultivators, gardening forks, weeders and garden scissors; barbecue utensils, namely, barbecue forks, barbecue turners and barbecue sets comprised of barbecue forks, barbecue turners and barbecue tongs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 23, 1998 |
| 021 | Household cleaning products, namely, brooms, mops, feather dusters, household scrub brushes, squeegees, magnetic dusters, dustpans and brushes, crumb sweepers; toilet brushes and toilet plungers; kitchen utensils, namely, pie-servers, jar openers, ice cream scoops, bottle openers, non-electric can openers, garlic presses, turners, spatulas, cooking spoons, cooking forks; potato mashers; whisks; mixing bowls; kitchen scrubbing brushes; basting brushes; vegetable brushes, bagel holders; bottle stoppers; choppers; citrus juicers; coffee scoops; colanders; corkscrews; corn holders; egg slicers; food storage containers, namely, containers for food; frying screens; ice cube trays; meat tenderizers; melon ballers; mugs; nut crackers; pepper mills; potato ricers; salad tongs; salt shakers; shrimp cleaners; strainers; tea kettles; tea strainers; turkey basters; vacuum sealing wine preservers; baking utensils, namely, rolling pins, dough blenders, pastry brushes and sifters | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 23, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by General Housewares Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by General Housewares Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by General Housewares Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by HELEN OF TROY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HELEN OF TROY LIMITED (BARBADOS)
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named TOUCHABLES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PR23 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2007 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |