USPTO serial 75413942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C WOODBRIDGE
RICHARD C WOODBRIDGE WOODBRIDGE & ASSOCLATES PCP O BOX 592PRINCETON, NJ 08542-0592UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE ON NETWORK SERVERS AND FOR ADMINISTERING COMPUTER NETWORKS, NAMELY OPERATING SYSTEM PROGRAMS, NETWORK MANAGEMENT TOOLS AND UTILITY PROGRAMS FOR USE BY NETWORK ADMINISTRATORS, SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT TOOLS FOR MANAGING COMPUTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |