USPTO serial 75414060
CYBERCORP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RILEY, CAITLIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CYBERCORP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLYE S. FENTON
LESLYE S FENTON ODIN FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN PC9302 LEE HWY STE 1100FAIRFAX, VA 22031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES AND CONSULTATION RELATED THERETO, NAMELY, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS OF SOFTWARE USED IN INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS, ALL IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |