Drawing for R1 REACHONE

USPTO serial 75414112

R1 REACHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 607
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R1 REACHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A BATEMAN

DAVID A BATEMAN HANEMANN BATEMAN JONES & BARDWILL4550 THIRD AVE SESTE 101LACEY, WA 98503

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Telephone calling card servicesACTIVESep 26, 1997
038Telecommunications services, namely, personal communication and cellular telephone servicesACTIVESep 26, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2003ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Jan 30, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2000PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance