USPTO serial 75414163
HENRI JONAS SELECTION SINCE 1870 DEPUIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HENRI JONAS SELECTION SINCE 1870 DEPUIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FOOLSGOLD INVESTMENT CORPORATION
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
FOOLSGOLD INVESTMENT CORPORATION
ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO, CA
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H BEGLER
JAY BEGLER NIXON PEABODY2 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 27SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned and preserved vegetables, canned and preserved fruits, canned meat, canned and bottled fish, jams, jellies, marmalades and fruit preserves, cheese spreads, fruit-based spreads, vegetable-based spreads, meat-based spreads, fish-based spreads, pickles, olives and escargot | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits, crackers, cookies, spices, sauces, relishes, ketchup, mayonnaise, mustards, vinegars, noodles, pastas, rice, vermicelli and cereals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FOOLSGOLD INVESTMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FOOLSGOLD INVESTMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by I-D Foods Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named HENRI JONAS SELECTION SINCE 1870 DEPUIS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |