USPTO serial 75414435
1-800-JACK-OFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 1-800-JACK-OFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES L. BIKOFF
JAMES L BIKOFF SILVERBERG, GOLDMAN & BIKOFFGEORGETOWN PL STE 1201101 30TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of adult-oriented conversations by telephone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |