USPTO serial 75414444
RENAISSANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENAISSANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN L. WELCH
JOHN L. WELCH FOLEY HOAG LLPWORLD TRADE CENTER WEST155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting, and personnel services in the nature of providing business staffing services, providing computer information technology consultants on a contract basis | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Computer and computer related information technology consulting services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RENAISSANCE WORLDWIDE IT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RENAISSANCE WORLDWIDE IT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Registry, Inc., The
- Other trademarks owned by RENAISSANCE WORLDWIDE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RENAISSANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 23, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |