USPTO serial 75414627
KRYSTALROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRYSTALROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M5X 1C9, CA
Toronto, Ontario M5X 1C9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D RANDALL KING
D RANDALL KING MERCHANT & GOULD PC3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical substitute or additive for binders for cement and concrete in construction and building product manufacturing; and chemical binders for use in industrial molds, in fire retardants and in cladding for buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Briquettes, blocks, slabs and pellets composed of waste containing heavy metals, iron, carbon and other waste by-products from steel making furnaces or coke batteries which can be reintroduced into the steel manufacturing process | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Building materials, namely, concrete, concrete blocks, paving stones and bricks in which waste materials are substituted for virgin aggregates | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Toxic waste removal and remediation | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Waste treatment services, namely, demobilization of contaminants through a process encapsulating materials by capturing and locking in toxic materials, for use rendering waste particles more easily disposable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KRYSTAL BOND INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KRYSTAL BOND INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named KRYSTALROCK
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |