Drawing for BETSY CAMERON

USPTO serial 75414711

BETSY CAMERON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETSY CAMERON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL

EDWARD H ROSENTHAL FRANKFURT GARBUS KLEIN & SELZ PC488 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, namely beds, pillows, chairs, couches, ottomans, dressers, chests, desks, stool, mirrors, tables, armoires, wardrobes, settees and vanity tables all for household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 14, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance