USPTO serial 75415057
IMPAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMPAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURIE A MILLER
LAURIE MILLER LAW OFFICE OF LAURIE MILLER3542 OAK KNOL DRREDWOOD CITY, CA 94062UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for use in the treatment of cardiovascular, neurological, oncological, hormonal, immunological, musculoskeletal, respiratory, alimentary and metabolic diseases and conditions; anti-infectives; nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 4, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |