USPTO serial 75415120
SITEMATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SITEMATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES F. STRUTHERS
JAMES F STRUTHERS AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC395 PAGE MILL RDP O BOX 10395PALO ALTO, CA 94303-0870Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | APPARATUS, DEVICES, EQUIPMENT, AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, SEMICONDUCTOR TESTERS, AND SOFTWARE FOR DESIGNING AND TESTING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLETS, BOOKS, CATALOGS, REPRINTS OF ARTICLES, DATA SHEETS, INFORMATIONAL PRODUCTION AND SYSTEM APPLICATION NOTES, TECHNICAL BULLETINS, PRODUCT AND SYSTEM OPERATING AND SERVICE MANUALS, ALL THE FOREGOING RELATED TO SOFTWARE FOR DESIGNING AND TESTING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER AND DATA PROCESSING SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, RENTAL OF COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, LEASING OF COMPUTERS, ENGINEERING SERVICES AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF ENGINEERING, INCLUDING COMPUTER, ELECTRONIC, SIGNALLING, MEASURING AND DATA PROCESSING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hewlett-Packard Company
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SITEMATCH
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |