USPTO serial 75415204
NETCONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETCONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L JOY GRIEBENOW
L JOY GRIEBENOW MSC H3-3A-05ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP5400 LEGACY DRPLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer hardware and software integration and migration services for mainframe systems | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |