USPTO serial 75415578
LEDISPERSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEDISPERSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CH-4132 Muttenz, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP P MCCANN
ANTHONY A BISULCA CLARIANT CORPORATION4000 MONROE RDINDUSTRIAL PROPERTY DEPTCHARLOTTE, NC 28205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | polymeric material in crude state containing chemical additive(s) and/or pigment(s) for use in the plastics industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | pigments and dyestuffs for use in the coloring of plastics | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | semi-finished polymeric materials for use in the plastics industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |