USPTO serial 75415585
COFFEE TIME DONUTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2756432Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 26, 2003
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COFFEE TIME DONUTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
Scarborough, Ontario M1R 4E5, CA
COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
Scarborough, Ontario M1R 4E5, CA
COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
Toronto, Ontario M1P 2Y7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie Brennan
Valerie Brennan Hogan Lovells US LLP7930 Jones Branch Drive, 9th FloorBox Intellectual PropertyMcLean, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 24, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by COFFEE TIME DONUTS INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COFFEE TIME DONUTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |