USPTO serial 75415616
PEANUT BUTTERCUP SWEETIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEANUT BUTTERCUP SWEETIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald A. Kaul
DONALD A KAUL DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 300 SWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Plush toys, animated plush toys, mechanical plush toys, action figures and accessories therefore, playset buildings and accessories therefor, toy jewelry, dolls and accessories therefor, miniaturized dolls and accessories therefor, collectible toy figures, mechanical action figures and accessories therefor, toy jewelry boxes, cases for play accessories, pocket playsets comprising any of toy figures, dolls, collectible toy figures, action figures, toy building and toy background panoramas; toy tea sets, toy animal figures, fashion dolls, clothing for fashion dolls and accessories therefore, namely, clothing, cases for fashion dolls; children's dress up sets comprising toy masks and children's toy cosmetics; toy mechanical vehicles for fashion dolls, costumes for dolls and collectible fashion dolls, doll accessories, namely, collectible doll display stands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |