USPTO serial 75415742
BRETT FAVRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRETT FAVRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Milwaukee, WI, US
gulfport, MS, US
Milwaukee, WI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. WHITAKER RAYNER
W. WHITAKER RAYNER Jones Walker LLP190 East Capitol Street, Suite 800JACKSON, MS 39201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Football helmets and protective helmets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, posters, trading cards, books, namely, commemorative books, publications namely programs for professional football championship games, football season reviews and summaries | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, caps, athletic shoes, shoes and jackets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1999 |
| 028 | Sporting goods, namely, footballs, toys in the nature of collector helmets and souvenir helmets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1997 |
| 035 | Endorsement services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the issuance of product and service endorsements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of personal appearances by a football player | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Favre, Brett
- Other trademarks owned by Favre, Brett
- Other trademarks owned by Favre, Brett
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BRETT FAVRE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 26, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 28, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |