USPTO serial 75415848
BODYFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BODYFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
40547 Dusseldorf, DE
40547 Dusseldorf, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W BECKER
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES707 HWY 66 E STE BTIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |