Drawing for ORASTAR

USPTO serial 75415952

ORASTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORASTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD DUNTON

FOUR STAR PARTNERS245-M MT HERMON RD 115SCOTTS VALLEY, CA 95066

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Non-medicated toothpaste; non-medicated dental gels; non-medicated mouthwashes and mouth rinse; and chewing gums for cosmetic usesACTIVE—
005Medicated toothpaste, medicated dental gels; medicated mouthwashes; medicated mouth rinses; chewing gums and lozenges which provide a protective dental or gingival barrier, coating or sealant for preventive, prophylactic or therapeutic hygiene useACTIVE—
010Interdental applicators for applying a protective dental or gingival barrier, coating or sealant for preventive, prophylactic or therapeutic oral hygiene useACTIVE—
021Toothbrushes; dental flosses; dental tapes; dental ribbons; interdental cleaners, namely, interdental brushes for both domestic and professional use, dental picks and toothpicks which provide a protective dental or gingival barrier, coating or sealant for preventive, prophylactic or therapeutic oral hygiene useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 11, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 20, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 20, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 27, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 21, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 1998AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance