Drawing for MEDIUM GRAIN SUPREME QUALITY

USPTO serial 75416311

MEDIUM GRAIN SUPREME QUALITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIUM GRAIN SUPREME QUALITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY J KELLY

TIMOTHY J KELLY FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Rice and rice mixesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 14, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 13, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 25, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance