Drawing for SUPERINVESTOR

USPTO serial 75416692

SUPERINVESTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERINVESTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN FAGAN TEICH

JOAN FAGAN TEICH GELTNER & ASSOC PCNUMBER 10 E ST SEWASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial and investment servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 9, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 9, 2001EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 11, 2000CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 17, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 17, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 13, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 9, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance