USPTO serial 75416715
COMCAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMCAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY J. NELSON
GARY J NELSON CHRISTIE PARKER & HALE LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computerized control and management interface unit for use in automobiles which facilitates the user's control and management of various vehicle functions; a computerized multimedia unit for use in an automobile whereby audio and video media are added to the traditional text media to convey information to the users regarding the function and operation of various system functions of the vehicle | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |