USPTO serial 75416794
TUFFSTUFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUFFSTUFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE L GREENFIELD
MICHAEL A. ALBERT WOLF GREENFIELD & SACKS PCFEDERAL RESERVE PLAZA600 ATLANTIC AVE.BOSTON, MA 02210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | PLASTIC FOOD STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |