USPTO serial 75416865
NORDICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 4, 2006
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NORDICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TREVIGNANO (TREVISO), IT
PONZANO VENETO (TREVISO), IT
PONZANO VENETO (TREVISO), IT
PONZANO VENETO (TREVISO), IT
DEL MONTELLO (Treviso), IT
(Treviso), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Bak
William Bak Howson & Howson LLPFive Sentry East, Suite 160325 Sentry Parkway EastBlue Bell, PA 19422Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ SPECTACLES, SPECTACLE FRAMES, SUNGLASSES, SPECTACLE CASES, SPECTACLE CHAINS, ] [ CRASH HELMETS ] [ AND SKI GOGGLES ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 018 | TRAVELLING BAGS, ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS [, BELT POUCHES, SCHOOL BAGS, SUITCASES, DOCUMENT HOLDERS, WALLETS, PURSES AND SATCHELS ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 025 | EAR-FLAPS, SKI-HATS, KNEE-LENGTH SOCKS, SKI-SUITS AND SPORTS SUITS IN GENERAL, [ FIELD HOCKEY SHOES,] COATS, JACKETS AND WIND-RESISTANT JACKETS, [ RAINCOATS,] PULLOVERS, T-SHIRTS, [ SKIRTS,] TROUSERS, [ JEANS, BATHING SUITS, FOULARDS, TIES,] BELTS, [ SUSPENDERS,] HATS, SCARVES, [ UNDERWEAR,] SKI-TIGHTS, VESTS, [ BERMUDA SHORTS,] WAISTCOATS, BOOTS, [ SLIPPERS, SANDALS, CLASSIC ] AND SPORTS SHOES AND SUN VISORS; [ AFTER SKI BOOTS; ] SKI BOOT BAGS | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
| 028 | SNOW SKIS, SKI POLES, SKI BINDINGS [, GYMNASTIC IMPLEMENTS, NAMELY, TRAMPOLINES, BALANCE BEAMS, PARALLEL BARS, SPRINGBOARDS, UNEVEN BARS AND HORSES; RACKETS FOR TENNIS, PADDLEBALL, SQUASH, BADMINTON, RACQUETBALL AND TABLE TENNIS, AND PLAYING CARDS ] | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BENETTON SPORTSYSTEM S.P.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BENETTON GROUP SPA
- Other trademarks owned by BENETTON GROUP SPA
- Other trademarks owned by BENETTON GROUP SPA
- Other trademarks owned by TECNICA GROUP S.P.A
- Other trademarks owned by NORDICA S.P.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NORDICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 13, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - SEE PUBLIC NOTE | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |