USPTO serial 75417032
NVS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NVS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES M. MARMELSTEIN
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHNSTE 6001050 CONNECTICUT AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | IMAGE REFLECTION PROCESSING SYSTEMS, COMPRISING AN INFRARED CAMERA FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES FOR ASSISTANCE WITH VISIBILITY; MOTOR VEHICLE NAVIGATION ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS COMPRISING INFRARED CAMERAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |